Saturday, May 28, 2011

Press: BJP Investor Cell against fraudulent companies duping investors at Jantar Mantar

There are dozens of companies which are engaged in online fraudulent schemes collecting thousands of crores of rupees from small investors across the country. The BJP Investors Cell held a protest and pradarshan at Jantar Mantar today. The Speak Asia company, whose promoters are not known and not registered in India had collected Rs.1800 crores from small investors and remitted to foreign country. There is a gross violation of rules and regulation. SEBI, RBI, Company Affairs, Enforcement Directorate and other regulatory agencies are just sleeping on this cheating, which is continuing for more than 1½ years. BJP General Secretary, Shri Vijay Goel, wondered as to how a company can give 40% return in a month, which is just like the plantation companies and other NBFC companies who had cheated the general public and investors in the past. He demanded that immediate action against the fraudulent persons and officers concerned for not taking timely initiative, and that they be sent to jail.

A memorandum asking action against such companies has been prepared by the investors cell. Shri Arun Singh, National Convenor, Small Investors Cell said that on meeting senior officials in the Company Affairs, Economic Affairs and PMO, it was transpired that they are unaware of such companies. He said that the Small Investors Cell would launch nation-wide protest against such companies/their franchisee set up across the country.

Shri Ashok Goel, National Co-Convenor, demanded immediate investigation on such companies, which had duped millions of small investors, and blamed the Government officials sleeping – Kumbhkaran Nidra. Shri Chandra Sekhar Sharma, National Co-convenor blamed the inactiveness and ineffectiveness of the regulatory agencies. In the pradarshni and protest march Shri Roshan Kansal, State Convenor, Delhi, Shri Mahesh Chauhan, UP State Convenor, Shri Jogi Ram Jain, Co-Convenor, Delhi State, Shri B.B. Jain, Co-Convenor besides other prominent leaders and hundreds of investors were present. They expressed great grievance and anger.

Copy of the memorandum submitted to the Finance Ministry is attached.

(O.P. KOHLI)
Headquarter Incharge

Speech made by Shri Ravi Shankar Prasad on Indo-US Relationship at USA

Main points of the speech made by Shri Ravi Shankar Prasad, MP, General Secretary & Chief Spokesperson, BJP at the Hudson Institute (well-known think tank) in Washington, USA on May 19, 2011 on the subject: Indo US Relationship ; its Strategic and Security Dimensions.

Indo-US Security relationship is not the mere coming together of the most pre-eminent world power the United States, and the emerging World Power with the potential to become a stabilizing influence in the world i.e. India for mere strategic purposes. It is the result of the shared understanding of the challenges that confront the contemporary world and a shared commitment to find a solution. This relationship is indeed rich as also complex and at times tenuous and tardy. I would describe it as an engagement that has the potential to shape Asia and indeed a substantial part of the world.

President Barack Obama recently described Indo-US relationship as an indispensable partnership of the 21st century. My leader, former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, who played a very powerful role in opening up a refreshing new relationship with America based upon mutual trust and respect, described the coming together of these two great countries, owing to common aspirations and values which have universal appeal.

Obviously, democracy, pluralism, fundamental freedoms, human rights, tolerance and celebration of diversity are shared values which deepen these relationships. In my very considered view, the centrality of our bilateral relationship is integral to the evolving course of international relations in the 21st century and more particularly on how Asia develops. This is very relevant, because Asia is home to two emerging global powers – China and India. We in the BJP have also looked forward to a better Indo-US relationship, which has great potential indeed.

FUTURE CHALLENGES

  1. The gap between the comprehensive national power of India and China is likely to widen this decade, before India starts to catch up at the latter part of this period.
  2. China will increasingly become the largest economic partner for India and seems very eager to meet India’s infrastructural and at times even financial needs to sustain its own growth momentum that shows signs of slowing soon.
  3. The third most important challenge is that China’s political assertiveness not only in the region but also with India will increase. It is indeed creating a paradox for us, a growing economic partnership and a much sharpened political contest – a policy challenge for India. China’s growing proximity with Pakistan both in defence and strategic affairs is indeed a cause for great concern.
  4. The Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean will witness a slow but a strong power shift. China will try to increase their area of denial capability. Obviously control of Indian Ocean has a strong linkage to energy security, where the Indian Navy is playing and will play a further powerful role, from the Gulf of Harmooz to the Gulf of Malacca.

How the issue of energy security would affect the bilateral ties – whether it would foment and manifest a cooperative or conflictive framework, is yet to be seen. China’s political ambition, with all the South Asian countries and the asymmetric relationship it is entering into with smaller states, is something that cannot be ignored. India would not be willing to see Asia dominated by one power. We are for good and friendly relations with China but not at the cost of our strategic interest. I am sure both America and India have a common interest in ensuring that the new balance of power in Asia is not inimical to either of them.

WAR AGAINST TERROR

Terrorism today is not a country specific phenomenon. It is indeed the most dangerous challenge to the whole world. It poses a serious security threat and both the US and India, can and must work together as a major responsible power of the world. We ourselves have suffered a lot. Thousands of innocent Indians have been killed. It is indeed unfortunate that any major terrorist attack in any part of the world has to have some linkage in our neighborhood. It is almost certain that the epicenter of world terror lies almost in our neighborhood. Majority of terrorist attacks in India have been sponsored from across the border. Be it 9/11, the London and Madrid underground train bombing, Bali terrorist attack, the 26/11 attack on Mumbai, in which hundreds of Indians including Americans were killed – they have a clear linkage and pattern.

We in the BJP have always believed, as eloquently articulated by our leader Mr. Atal Bihari Vajpayee, that we can change our friends but we cannot change our neighbours. We wish Pakistan well. It has a fine human resource, which needs freedom and democracy to shine. America needs to recognize that Armed Forces cannot redeem Pakistan. It is time for America to introspect how productive its investment in the military establishment of Pakistan has been over the years. 10 years of Field Marshal Ayub Khan, 4 years of General Yahya Khan, 11 years of General Zia-ul-Huq and 9 years of General Musharraf. The role of the Generals occupies more than half of Pakistan’s independent existence.

Why is it that, inspite so much investment, your assets of yesterday are turning out to be the monsters of today. Osama Bin Laden was sitting safely in the backyards of Pakistan’s capital and the first thing Pakistan did was to hand over the remains of the US helicopter set on fire in Abbottabad for China to replicate. The Osama Bin Laden episode only confirms that Pakistan as an ally in the War against terror cannot be trusted. How long will the terrorist groups and their camps be allowed to operate with impunity inside Pakistan? Bruce Riedel, Senior Fellow at Brookings Institution has very aptly commented that “Pakistan Army is at war with some of them (Taliban) and in bed with others (Lashkar-e-Taiba)”. Many of these strategic assets, which are a serious threat to the United States as well, have greatly benefited from the generous assistance of important elements from the Pakistan Armed Forces.

It is important to remember that the US obsession with Pakistan has allowed China to expand its area of influence while keeping its hands clean. The deep nexus which the Chinese military has been able to establish with the Pakistan military is already strong enough to deny US its strategic space in Asia. Pakistan will of course use the China card and will continue to insist on favors as it has done in the past. Today, there is a real apprehension and indeed high probability of terrorist groups and their patrons within the armed forces establishment getting hold of radio-active or nuclear material. This is a serious complex situation in South Asia and how we manage this will decide our common and individual future in the region and beyond.

CONCLUSION

There is a broad political consensus about where the Indo-US Relationship should head and we are a part of that consensus. Our democracy permits the space to have disagreement on certain specific issues, but it ought not to be mistaken as opposition to the United States or improving Indo-US relationship. We in the BJP have great faith in the story of India. We are very proud of our civilization and cultural heritage, and the bonds which the abiding value of cultural nationalism creates. I urge you to believe in this story of India. From friends to partners is the journey that we need to undertake, and I am confident many of us are willing to walk the distance……

(O.P. KOHLI)

Headquarter Inchrage

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

It is time for Karnataka Governor to go

The Karnataka Governor is an arrogant politician. He is unfit to be a constitutional authority, acting like a petty congress politician.he is in the company of Devegowda and Kumarasamy and congress leader Siddaramaiah

the unlawful politicians wants to topple people friendly BJP Government,
even after showing the majority. this is only Because this is a BJP Govt.

Devegowda Kumarswamy, Siddaramaiha and the Governor togehter playing dirty tricks to topple BJP Government Please help us to show the door to Governor Bharadwaj.

Friday, May 20, 2011

High Petrol Price

Election Results in 5states

Governor’s report gets critisism from all the sides

BV Acharya former advocate general.: The governor has recommended President’s rule citing various reasons including corruption, horse trading and violation of constitutional propriety. “But at present there is no constitutional crisis. Chief minister BS Yeddyurappa-led government is functioning with absolute majority. According to me, the Union cabinet has to reject the governor’s report,”

Ashok Harnahalli advocate-general : It is not easy to impose president’s rule in the state. The current situation in the state is not fit for invoking Article 356 and impose president’s rule. If the Union government decides to impose president’s rule in the Karnataka, it may have to face serious consequences. Though the governor has said that the BJP government is involved in corruption, allowed breakdown of constitutional machinery in the state and was not functioning properly, the Union government cannot take a decision based on the report now that the situation has changed with the rebel BJP MLAs deciding to support the government.

KV Dhananjay Supreme Court advocate: The governor’s recommendation to keep the assembly under suspended animation is inexplicable. The governor’s action is complete denigration of his duties, as specified in the SR Bommai case. No constitutional breakdown is visible apparently or even on closer inspection. No governor is expected to recommend imposition of the president’s rule six months after certain acts of commission and omission by the chief minister and the speaker. If the recommendation of the governor were to be acted upon, the democratic tradition of this country is bound to suffer further.

MB Nargund High court advocate: Governor’s recommendation as a “political move”. The governor has committed a blunder. First, the recommendation is against the provisions of law. Second, it is against the well established rules elaborated by the Supreme Court in the Bommai case. Even if the UPA government accepts the governor’s report, it will be definitely set aside by the court of law.

Missing The Point

May 18, 2011, 12.58am The Times of India

Chief minister B S Yeddyurappa's parading 114 of his MLAs - with more letters of support - in Delhi was a show of strength which gave the lie to Karnataka governor Hans Raj Bhardwaj's call for President's rule. Bhardwaj's recommendation just doesn't add up, despite his relying on numbers in the assembly and a Supreme Court ruling. Neither leads to the governor's conclusions which not only devalue his judgment but also raise suspicions about his ability to act in the non-partisan manner expected of a governor.

Unfortunately real problems of governance which threaten the future of the state have been ignored thanks to Bhardwaj's fatuous and repeated insistence on imposing President's rule. He did so last year but this time around his recommendation's been prompted by the Supreme Court reversing the Karnataka high court's decision last year to disqualify 11 rebel BJP MLAs and five independents. The rebellion reduced Yeddyurappa's government to a minority in the 225-member assembly, but simultaneously the rebel MLAs were also disqualified. Hence, though Bhardwaj ordered a floor test, Yeddyurappa won it with 106 votes for and 100 against. Now that the rebel MLAs have been reinstated, Bhardwaj claims they're not BJP. Hence the assertion Yeddyurappa's running a minority government. But that's ignoring the facts. Ten of the rebels have returned to the fold and the BJP still maintains the lead.

Rajdeep Sardesai

When out of work netas become governors, they are extremely dangerous. HR Bhardwaj is the latest example.

Governors should be people of stature, not political hatchetmen. Raj Bhavans cant be addas for bringing down govts.

Barkha Dutt:

Karnataka and yeddy govt are bjps albatross in anti corruption campaign. But gives no basis to unconstitutionally oust govt minus floor test

If the congress has an iota of smartness it will reject the karnataka governor report. Raj bhawans role not to “acquire” assemblies.

Irony is Bharadwaj manages, every time, to make Yeddy look like the nice guy. The congress should consider dismissing him instead.

Sagarika Ghose:

Why is governor Bhardwaj acting like an opposition leader in Ktaka? Undermining office and stature of Raj Bhavan.

Saturday, May 14, 2011

BJP wins all 3 by-elections in Karnataka

The Bharateeya Janata Party has won all three by-election seats held in April 2001 in Karnataka.

In Jagaluru constituency, SV Ramachandra of BJP wins with the margin of 4432.

CP Yogeshwar wins in Channapaatna with a heavy margin of more than 17,000 vote.

Bangarapet voters elected M. Narayana Swamy of BJP with a lead of 4044 votes.

After the results, CM expressed his thanks to voters and candidates in a press meet held in Krishna.

Assessment of the results of five state assembly elections

BJP Parliamentary Board met in New Delhi today to discuss the results of the election to the five state assemblies.

The BJP is of the opinion that the result of each assembly is state-specific.

An anti-incumbency wave factor due to lack of actual development has impacted the result in West Bengal. Corruption and family nepotism has influenced the election results in Tamil Nadu.

The BJP regrets that the lack of opposition unity resulted in the absence of a credible alterative in Assam.

The global decline of the Marxist ideology appears to have belatedly arrived in India.

The results of the bye elections in Chattisgarh and Karnataka are satisfying for the BJP.

The BJP congratulates the winners of these elections in each state and hopes that they will be able to live up to the faith that the voter have reposed in them.

Thursday, May 5, 2011

Osama Bin Laden killing & Afzal Guru: Sh

BJP Statement on Terrorism

The BJP considers the elimination of Osama Bin Laden – the global face of terrorism as a high point of the global war on Terror. The fact that Osama was housed in a mansion close to a Pakistani Military academy establishes that Pakistan is the epicenter of Global Terrorism which was harbouring the most wanted global Terrorist.

India’s legitimate concern that those who have perpetrated terror in India are also housed comfortably in Pakistan is no longer in doubt. Pakistan can no longer claim that it is a victim of terror. Those who use terrorism as an instrument of state policy will always suffer due to their duplicity.

The Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh and the UPA government need to introspect upon their policy towards Pakistan. Talks and Terror cannot co-exist. Pakistan is a sponsor and user of terror and not its victim. Pakistan has not been honest in its commitment that its territory will not be/ is not being used for terror. The world has realized this reality. We urge the Government of India also sees reason in it.